LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT REPORTS
A monthly digest of current Louisiana Supreme Court opinions Showing results 2256 through 2268
Archive of LSCR Articles

Showing entire archive, newest articles first. Articles date back to September 2001.
Jump to a direct Volume/Issue
CIVIL PROCEDURE

1.Court of appeal erred in rendering decision after settlement by parties.
Council of the City of New Orleans v. Sewerage & Water Board, 06-C-1989 (La. 4/11/07) [6 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 4
          The Council of the City of New Orleans ("Council") filed suit against, inter alia, the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans ("SWB") seeki... view full summary
DOMESTIC RELATIONS

2.Retroactive application of peremptive period for avowal action not unconstitutional.
W.R.M. v. H.C.V, 2006-CA-0702 (La. 3/9/07) [20 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 4

          Plaintiff W.R.M. filed a petition to establish his paternity of A.M.V., the 9-year-old child of H.C.V., alleging that he is the biologic... view full summary
CRIMINAL

3.Police pursuit of defendant into a private home does not require a warrant.
State v. Keith Walker, 06-KK-1045 (La. 4/11/07) [14 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 4
          The State appeals an order suppressing evidence. Police observed the defendant and another man standing directly in front of a residence at ... view full summary
4.District court erred in exposing jury to habitual offender allegations.
State v. Gregory Ruiz, 06-KO-1755 (La. 4/11/07) [14 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 4
          Defendant was charged by bill of information with distribution of cocaine in violation of La.R.S. S 40:967(A)(1), and possession of cocaine ... view full summary
5.Codefendants may agree to appeal common issue as part of guilty plea agreement.
State v. Jorgio Mack, 06-K-1722 (La. 4/27/07) [2 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 4
          Defendant agreed to plead guilty, adopting his codefendant's motion to suppress evidence, and reserving his right to appeal the district cou... view full summary
TORTS

6.Co-counsel do not owe each other fiduciary duty.
William J. Scheffler, III v. Adams and Reese, 06-CC-1774 (La. 2/22/07) [17 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 3
          Plaintiff Scheffler is an attorney who was retained by Boomtown Casino Westbank ("Boomtown") to defend personal injury claims filed against ... view full summary
INSURANCE

7.No duty to defend lawsuit by former partner and co-counsel alleging "malpractice."
Howard P. Elliott v. Continental Casualty Company, 06-CC-1505 (La. 2/22/07) [14 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 3
          Plaintiff Howard P. Elliott, Jr. practiced law on various cases together with attorney Madro Bandaries. Fee disputes arose between the two; ... view full summary
CIVIL PROCEDURE

8.Surveillance video not strictly impeachment evidence and must be produced.
Bell v. Treasure Chest Casino, 06-CC-1538 (La. 2/22/07]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 3
          Plaintiff Bell was allegedly injured when struck in the back with a pushcart operated by Juanita Morgan, an employee of defendant Treasure C... view full summary
EVIDENCE

9."Prior bad act" evidence admissible.
State v. Randy Rose, 06-K-0402 (La. 2/22/07) [18 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 3
          Defendant Rose was charged with second degree murder of his wife, Lisa James Rose. The State filed a notice of intent to use evidence of oth... view full summary
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

10.Tax redemption by any person inures to the benefit of the record owner of the property
Sid Hebert, Sheriff v. Katie M. Hollier, 06-C-1077 (La. 3/9/07) [7 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 3
          In September, 2002, defendant Katie Hollier purchased a one-tenth ownership interest in a tract of immovable property for the sum of $3,762.... view full summary
11.Legal issues raised more than 30 days after passage of bond ordinance are perempted.
Naquin v. Lafayette City-parish Consolidated Government, 2006-C-2227 (La. 2/22/07) [29 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 3
          Taxpayers of the City of Lafayette moved to invalidate a bonds issued by the Lafayette City-Parish Government ("Lafayette") to develop a sta... view full summary
CRIMINAL

12.Ameliorative changes to criminal penalty does not mean normal sentence is excessive.
State v. Robert, 06-K-1872 (La. 3/9/07) [2 pp.]
From LSCR Volume 15, Issue 3
          Defendant appealed his habitual offender sentence as excessive, in light of the ameliorative changes in the penalty for distribution of mari... view full summary
View next 12 articles